dac report Archives

Truck Drivers DAC Report Unconstitutional

DAC report unconstitutional

DAC report unconstitutional

Is the DAC Report unconstitutional?  The first ten amendments of the Constitution, which make up the Bill of Rights, include the amendment which requires that all citizens be provided with due process when either being accused of a crime or being penalized by another party for a civil matter.  The Bill of Rights were seen as such importance, that George Mason refused to sign until these rights were included.

Explaining his refusal to sign, Mason wrote:  “There is no Declaration of Rights, and the laws of the general government being paramount to the laws and constitution of the several States, the Declarations of Rights in the separate States are no security.  Nor are the people secured even in the enjoyment of the benefit of the common law.” To paraphrase it in simple terms:  every American citizen has the right to due process of law when accused or penalized by a separate party.

Yet, countless numbers of professional truck drivers are penalized by trucking companies through the false claims reported on their DAC Report.   The large majority of these truckers are caught in a situation where proving their case is impossible.   False DAC Reporting has been going on for years with trucking organizations and associations recognizing the problem, but doing nothing to stop it:

Recent comments from the Stop DAC petition:

  • “It’s not right that companies can destroy a driver’s driving record and stop them from ever getting a driving job again.”
  • “I quit Swift Transportation back in 07.  Took my truck back to the Richmond terminal because I was basically paying them to drive.  I was lucky I had some savings to fall back on while driving for this company.  Anyhow,  I cleared my truck and resigned at the terminal and I got a “NO SHOW” on my DAC.”
  • “I have seen it happen many times and I fully support this petition to stop the abuse that companies and DAC Services have been allowed to exercise for far too long.”
  • “I am an ex-FED DOT Agent and I witnessed first hand how many drivers would come into our office requesting we help them. They were not able to aquire employment because there was bad information in their reports.  I do believe this method is unfair and unjust to many a good driver.”
  • “My DAC now has False Information from US Xpress.  I went to orientation and on the 5 th day they let me go over the phone without giving me a reason why they were not hiring me.  I lived in Denver, Co. and they paid for me to go to Ca. for this.  My DAC shows I worked for them  and I Quit and was dismissed. This is False information that US Xpress has reported on my DAC.’
  • “Simply being accused on a DAC is enough to make getting hired virtually impossible.”

Our Stop False DAC Reporting petition is at 1,462 signatures and growing.  If the petition does nothing more than the continuance of showing how trucking companies retaliate against truckers, then I will continue to post the experiences drivers are facing with this abuse by the industry:

  • “As someone who has been in Human Resources for a few decades, I find it hard to believe that DAC is allowed to exist.  See, if Sally Sue applies at a local office and is hired, then she is protected under federal and state laws that govern what work related issues or job performance issues can be disclosed to others.  Many employee rights and privacy issues are in play. If Sally Sue fails to show up for work or leaves early, if she steals office supplies, if she shoots her boss even, it can not be disclosed by the company to others she may choose to apply with or work for.  DAC violates all employee rights to privacy.  If I were a driver and worked for one of these dirt bags that put ANYTHING derogatory on my DAC I would sue for slander and then retire rich.  It is not a legal system under employment laws in most states, nor is it completely legal under many federal rights to privacy.”
  • JB Hunt is the worst for reports for DAC.  False information, at fault accidents that are not in a vehicle, logbook errors. All BS.”
  • CRST shows terminated when I quit with notice and not under a load. Truck went to new driver ( no abandonment).”

You can read all the comments from the signers of the petition and see what these trucking companies are doing to our men and women of trucking.  Until DAC is shut down, you can contact the Truckers Justice Center which has been fighting for truckers rights for twenty years.   Truckers Justice Center specializes in helping drivers with the removal of false information on their DAC reports.  Their website states:

“(HireRight) maintains employment files (called DAC reports) on all commercial drivers that include accident records, drug testing reports and eligibility for rehire information from all previous employers. There are MANY incorrect reports in DAC files. Companies will put outright lies into DAC reports as retaliation against drivers. (HireRight) is a consumer reporting agency, which means you have a right to see the information kept in these reports and you have the right to correct the information under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. The Truckers Justice Center can help you correct your DAC reports.”

So the question remains:  is the DAC Report unconstitutional?  For the answer, I turned to Attorney Paul Taylor and this is what he said:

“The Bill of Rights applies to Government action, not private actions of motor carriers and consumer-reporting agencies.  As far as the DAC Report is concerned, they are definitely constitutional.”

Five years ago I started Truth About Trucking, the first to publicly expose the abuses and injustices that many truck drivers face within the long haul trucking industry.  Going public, we exposed the:

  • DAC Report
  • Trucking companies owner operator lease purchase plans
  • CDL training scams
  • Truth about the so-called truck driver shortage
  • Process of starving out drivers
  • Turning over student drivers as a means of cheap labor
  • Abuses by the “starter” trucking companies . . . and much more.

These were all the little insider secrets of the trucking industry that nobody was publicly sharing.   It was time to change that.  It was time that CDL students and new drivers understood what they could be facing when looking at OTR trucking as a career.

There are many good and decent trucking companies, but there are more that are not so good.  Understanding the trials you will face when first starting out in trucking and knowing what to do after you “pay your dues” in this industry, is the foundation that Truth About Trucking stands on . . . to “Raise the standards of the trucking industry.”

Trucking companies continue to retaliate against drivers through the use of the abusive DAC system?  Then I’ll keep posting . . .

Allen Smith

© 2010, AskTheTrucker. All rights reserved.


Add to Technorati Favorites: , , , , ,

Related posts

When the Big Rigs Don't Roll

When the Big Rigs Don't Roll

Truck drivers will soon be seeing a new music CD filled with songs that focus on today’s trucking issues.   Issues such as the DAC report, the high cost of diesel fuel and the general life of a trucker and the challenges they face.  Not since the days of Red Sovine and C. W. McCall, has there been a true-blooded music CD generated for the men and women of trucking.  Songwriters David Ayers and Barry Allen are about to change all of that.

Having swept the internet with their smash hit, “When the Big Rigs Don’t Roll“, the CD of the same title is expected to be released within the following weeks.  With John Johnson performing the vocals, David and Barry wanted to put together a new, all original CD that would honor our nation’s truckers and shed light on the work and struggles that they endure on a daily basis.  The talented songwriters,having won numerous awards, “When the Big Rigs Don’t Roll” has been played at rallies in Washington, D.C., New York, Pennsylvania, Texas, Georgia, Florida and all across the USA and has been featured on CNN, Fox News, Cox News papers and internationally and is still broadcast through out the trucking industry.   Top Nashville music executives have referred to the song as an “Anthem comparable to the late, great hit “CONVOY” by C. W. McCall.”

One of the songs on the CD will be, “Say a Prayer for Jason“, a song dedicated to slain truck driver, Jason Rivenburg and in support of Jason’s Law, bill H. R. 2156.  Listeners of the Truth About Trucking “LIVE” talk radio show had the opportunity to hear, for the first time anywhere, this moving musical melody, paying tribute to one of trucking’s fallen.  The show aired live on Wednesday, July 7th, 2010 and Truth About Trucking “LIVE” was given exclusive permission by Allen & Ayers Productions to share a few of the songs on the soon to be released trucking CD.  “Say a Prayer for Jason” and “The Trucking Brand” were two of the songs broadcast live for the first time and can only be heard on Truth About Trucking “LIVE.”

The show, “The Truck Driver Shortage Fabrication“, also provided an update on Jason’s Law as explained to Truth About Trucking, LLC by Mr. Todd Kohr, a staff member on the Highway and Transit Sub Committee:  A perfect timing for “Say a Prayer for Jason” to be heard.  This broadcast focused on how current CDL training procedures, CSA 2010 and cross border trucking all relate and help to create the so-called truck driver shortage.  As one of our most listened to shows to date, listeners were able to hear for the first time, “Say a Prayer for Jason” and were advised about the news of the upcoming CD.

Since the 1970’s, truckers have not had a music CD produced and dedicated solely for them . . . I would say that it’s about time.  We’ll keep you posted on the release date and remember . . . you heard it here first!

Keep on Truckin’

Allen Smith


© 2010, AskTheTrucker. All rights reserved.


Add to Technorati Favorites: , , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

Wrong way for truck owner operators

wrong way for truck owner operators

Several years ago, nobody in trucking ever publicly spoke about the scam and abuse of the truck driver DAC report or the owner operator lease purchase programs offered through the trucking companies.  There were written comments and posts on a few of the trucking blogs and forums, but never out openly and in the public eye.  Truth About Trucking changed that.  Never considering that possible change could occur within these two industry frauds, my primary purpose in exposing these scams were purely for information.

Information and knowledge that needed to be exposed, publicly, in order for CDL students and new drivers to become aware of just a few of the abuses that exist in OTR trucking.

Just recently, I received an email from a driver who stated:  “I’ve been a driver for 15 years and never even heard of the DAC report.  Now, I see it everywhere.”

I was listening to a show on Sirius Satellite Radio and they were talking about the DAC abuse and I had to laugh a little . . . now, everyone seems to be talking and writing about the problem with this DAC issue.  Also, many are now discussing the fraudulent scheme of the lease purchase contracts by many of the trucking companies.  I have to laugh because I always wonder, “Where were they all several years ago?” Regardless of how it all got started, the most important factor in all of this is . . . they are talking about it.

In the past years, how many new CDL drivers have fallen victim to the DAC and the lease scams?  They knew nothing about them because nobody ever told them.  Although the critics have grown more silent, I will still receive a message now and then which will tell me that I will never be able to change anything because the trucking industry is too big and too powerful.  First of all, I agree.   I alone, will never be able to change anything . . . but I, along with thousands of others . . . will.

The DAC may continue on being DAC and the trucking companies may continue on with their lease purchase plans, but what these critics are missing is that change has already happened.  These two abuses within the industry are now more known than ever.  New drivers coming into the industry are more aware and knowledgeable than they were before.  Thousands have now learned about the DAC report abuse and thousands more have discovered the trickery and deceit behind these owner operator lease programs which are a big money-maker for the trucking companies.  This awareness . . . this knowledge . . . IS CHANGE.

I always like to make it a point to mention that there are a handful of trucking companies that offer a decent, reputable owner operator lease option.  However, for the large majority, these lease programs through the companies are totally designed for the driver to fail.  These trucks have been paid for over and over again by drivers.  They are a huge money-pit for truck drivers and a massive income provider for the trucking companies.

Many advertisers for owner operators will claim earnings of $100,000 plus per year, attempting to pull in the naive.  There are those who do gross $100K and more, but they are experienced veterans, yet these numbers are dwindling.  Also, remember that this number is gross and many will see net income of 50% or less . . . in a good economy.  In a 2008 study, the report showed that the average net income for a truck owner operator was $36,150 and the average net income for a company driver was $38,000.   Owner operators contracted through a trucking company lease program has shown a failure rate as high as 87 percent.  We are currently collecting new and updated data for this issue with our owner operator lease purchase program survey.

For those truck drivers wanting to become owner operators, the lease purchase plans offered through trucking companies have a proven track record of being the wrong road to take.  Leasing should be done only through a reputable, independent leasing company such as Lone Mountain Truck Leasing.  The majority of trucking companies offering lease purchase plans have established these programs as another means of profitability for the company, not the driver.  Everything within the lease is against the truck driver and totally for the company, right down to the insurance carrier.  Drivers wanting to become independent should lease from an outside source, such as Lone Mountain and secure their own insurance through another source, other than the trucking company.  For truck insurance coverage, we recommend RigQuote.

When I started Truth About Trucking, one of the first statements I made was that you can make trucking work as a career . . . if you choose the right company.  While listening to Sirius Radio the other day, I heard a trucking company advertising for drivers.  The announcer said, “Trucking can offer you a rewarding career, if you choose the right company.”

I had to laugh a little . . . again.

© 2010, AskTheTrucker. All rights reserved.


Add to Technorati Favorites: , , , , ,

Related posts

Trucking Companies Abusing the DAC Report

Stop False DAC ReportingWhich trucking companies are the worse offenders for filing false information against truck drivers to the DAC Reporting Services?

The DAC Report has long since become a retaliation tool against drivers by various trucking companies.  Our STOP False DAC Reporting petition is the first phase of combating this abuse against our professional drivers.  We need further help with the beginning of the second phase . . .

A simple, two-part question survey – False DAC Report – Worse Trucking Companies will work to collect the names of those trucking companies known to be the worse offenders in placing false information on drivers’ DAC reports.   Furthermore, drivers who have fallen victim of the DAC Report scam, are asked to provide the details of what false information was placed on their report.

As in the Stop False DAC petition,  information provided will never be shared to any other parties, nor collected for commercial purposes.    Responses containing advertising, links or any such kind of commercialization will be deleted.

While we continue our case against DAC Services, many of you have written me asking for assistance in removing false information from your DAC report, which have caused you to be blackballed from the industry.  I wanted to advise you of an employment law attorney who specializes in trucking matters.

Attorney Paul Taylor is with the law firm of Taylor & Associates, Ltd.    Their investigator has 30 years of trucking experience and the firm handles trucking abuse cases such as :

  • Refusal to Drive
  • Commercial Truck Lease Disputes
  • Drug and Alcohol Testing
  • DAC Reports
  • Truckers Justice Center states:

    “There are MANY incorrect reports in DAC  files.  Companies will put outright lies into DAC reports as retaliation against drivers.  USIS, now HireRight,  is a consumer reporting agency, which means you have a right to see the information kept in these reports and you have the right to correct the information under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.   The Truckers Justice Center can help you correct your DAC reports.”

    You can contact the Justice Center for Truckers at:

    Truckers Justice Center
    900 West 128th Street
    Suite 104
    Burnsville, MN 55337
    Telephone : 651-454-5800

    We will keep you posted on our fight to stop false DAC Reporting . . . Click here to take survey

    © 2010, AskTheTrucker. All rights reserved.


    Add to Technorati Favorites: , , , , ,

    Related posts

    Allen SmithBy: Allen Smith

    On November 9th, 2009 we began our Owner Operator Lease Purchase Program survey, in order to collect data on this issue which has caused many drivers to fail within the trucking industry.  I have always proposed that this program is one that is designed for the truck driver to fail, having noted that past studies have shown that this lease purchase option resulted in an 87% failure rate for drivers.

    I will continue to let this survey run further, to collect as much data as possible.  Consisting of ten questions, as of today, the following are the results of our truck owner operator lease purchase program survey:

    • Was the Owner Operator Lease Purchase Program you were under require any money down or credit check?

    YES – 30%
    NO  – 70%

    • Were you given the opportunity to choose the truck of your choice, or did the company choose for you?

    Driver Choice  – 52.5%
    Company Choice  – 47.5%

    • Which of the choices below best describes the amount of gross income the company said you would be able to make as an owner operator under their lease purchase plan?

    $35,000 to $45,000 per year  -  7.7%
    $46,000 to $65,000 per year  -  15.4%
    $66,000 to $100,000 per year  -  38.5%
    Over $100,000 per year  -  38.55%

    • What was your ACTUAL gross income?

    Overall Average -  $36,545.77

    • How many miles did the company say you would average per week as a lease purchase owner operator?

    Overall Spread – 1800 to 5000

    • What were your ACTUAL miles per week average?

    Overall Average – 2000 to 2739

    • How would you rate the company’s overall support system, in assuring your success as an owner operator?

    Excellent  -  2.6%
    Very Good  – 15.4%
    Good  -  7.7%
    Poor  – 59%
    No Support at all  – 17.95%

    • Overall, how mechanically sound was the truck you were placed in?

    Excellent    -  7.5%
    Very Good  -  22.5%
    Good  -  27.5%
    Poor  -  27.5%
    Piece of junk  -  17.55%

    • Once started, how soon thereafter did you experience your first serious mechanical/safety issue with the tractor?

    Overall Average  -  Within 4 months

    • Based on your experience, what is your overall view on these “No Money Down – No Credit Check” Owner Operator Lease Purchase Programs?

    Legitimate  -   11%
    Scam  -  57%
    Don’t Know  -  32%

    Our survey for the trucking industry’s owner operator lease purchase program will remain open.  If you have been involved with one of these lease purchase deals, please take the survey.   We will continue to update on its progress.

    Furthermore, we are working “behind the scenes” to move forward with our Stop False DAC Reporting petition.   Signatures received thus far: 1,243.  An update to this important issue will be noted at the appropriate time.

    Thanks,

    Allen Smith

    Truth About Trucking, LLC

    © 2010, AskTheTrucker. All rights reserved.


    Add to Technorati Favorites: , , , , ,

    Related posts

    How to Remove False Information From the DAC Report

    By:  Allen Smith

    Allen SmithIt is a constant battle.  Thousands of truck drivers unable to find another truck driving job due to false information having been reported to their DAC report.  The number of drivers affected is unknown.  Other false information is constantly being spread through-out the internet, such as one poster stated that the information on the DAC report is 99.9 percent accurate . . . yet, the poster provides no evidence of where this number comes from.  Of course, it is a percentage that he has just pulled out of the air, based on whatever his agenda is.   It is often not difficult to discover why such behavior goes on.  Such as the case of this poster making the 99.9% comment.  Hiding in the forum as a “driver” he is in fact,  an owner of a trucking company.  I prefer to deal with facts, not whimsical numbers and exaggerated statements from a trucking forum that will not allow those drivers to post their DAC stories and show their support of the  Stop False DAC Reporting petition.

    Another trucking forum refused to allow us to post the link to the  DAC petition to their forum saying that we were “only trying to advertise.”  Perhaps I am naive?  I assumed that trucking forums were for the drivers?  If not, what do you think they are for?

    Furthermore, when you dig a little deeper, trying to discuss the issues facing the industry and drivers today, I will receive a post back similar to:  “You are only trying to sell your eBooks.” Forget about the time spent answering emails, returning phone calls, posting to this blog, broadcasting our Blog Talk Radio show . . . it is all about “trying to sell your eBooks.” Once again, confirming my past article:  The Truck Driver’s Worst Enemy.

    This is why I am not big on trucking forums.  There are only a handful of trucking forums that provide excellent, fair and honest postings.  As CDL students or new drivers, realize that whoever is answering your questions you post to the forum, you have no idea who they are.  One example is where a new driver asked a question about a certain trucking company and wanted to know if it was a good company to go to.  The answer he received was very positive, praising the company and advising him that it would be a great company to get on with.   A few months later the new driver was back in the forum, telling his poor experience with the company.  It was later identified that the answer had come from a recruiter of the said company.  Remember, this is still the internet . . . when asking advise and opinions inside these trucking forums, etc., it could be anybody with an impressive “handle” giving you advise.    A key sign to a poor forum is when you try to post a comment that is biased against the conversation that is occurring, and they will “not allow” your comment to post.  This is a sign the trucking forum or other various site, has an agenda of some kind.

    I will generally get pulled into posting on some forums, but I mainly stay away.   Most of the forums just want to do what they have been doing for years and years . . . just the same old talk and “blah, blah, blah” but never really standing up and taking any action of any kind to help raise the standards of the trucking industry for both, the industry and drivers.  Taking actual “action” for a good cause is too much work.  The “blah, blah, blah” is much easier to do.

    As far as complete accuracies for the DAC report, I have no idea what the numbers are.  Even if the 99.9% is correct, (which it is not), with four million active CDL drivers in the United States, that would mean that 4,000 drivers have had false information placed on their DAC report, ruining their livelihood.  Yet, I have received hundreds and hundreds of emails and letters from drivers across the country sharing their DAC stories with me, as well as having received, thus far, 1,043 signatures on the DAC petition.  Furthermore, I have received a large number of emails from drivers wanting to sign the petition, but fear being identified by their employer and losing their jobs.  I completely understand and would not want anyone to sign the petition if they thought they could lose their job for doing so.  Even if the number is only 4,000 drivers affected by false DAC reporting, what should we do?  Just leave them blowing in the wind?

    Whether or not we can reach the number of signatures needed for State Representatives, Congress and the Senate to take notice, remains to be seen.  There is much more  to bringing about reform on an issue than just having a petition.  It takes letters, phone calls, emails and various means of drawing attention to the fact that the cause is worth the attention of those with the power to bring about the reform.  The best example of this is the undying desire shown by the Rivenburg family for House Bill H. R. 2156, Jason’s Law.

    Will we make it?  I don’t know.  But unlike most of these trucking forums which choose to just send out meaningless chatter and find it too hard to stand up for a cause to help the industry and, most importantly drivers,  if we don’t make it, we can at least say we tried.  At least we stood up and took action . . . we did something.  I am continuing with the DAC cause and will further wait to see how it is shaping up . . . I have a lot of patience.

    Recently I have been getting quite a few emails from some of you facing false information on your DAC saying that you “quit without notice” even though you advise that you never even worked for the company, only attended the orientation.  This is how a trucking company can place this on your DAC Report:

    Once a company has assigned you a driver number, you are officially employed.  This number assignment is done during the orientation, in order to have you ready to go on your first load.  Even if the company tells you to go home and wait for your first load, having the driver number assigned to you and having been placed in their system, you are officially hired and an employee.   If you decide to call the next day and tell them you have chosen not to take the job after all, the company has to pay the accounting department, the HR department, etc., in removing the assigned number from you and pulling you out of their payroll system.  Not to mention the time and money they have put in with the training, motel expenses, food expenses and so forth.   Once that driver number has been assigned to you, legally your employment with the company has been accepted.  Even though you never actually drove for them, legally they can report that you quit without notice.

    Is it the moral thing to do?   No.   Is it the ethical and right thing to do?  No.  Is it legal?   Yes.   Due to false information being placed on drivers’ DAC reports, naturally you want to work at having it removed.  The first thought is SUE!  The DAC services are very acquainted with law suits and will not even blink an eye at this threat.   The proper way to handle removing false info from the report, is to follow the procedures laid out by DAC.

    • Receive a copy of your DAC Report
    • File a Dispute
    • Provide a written statement accounting your side of the story

    Sounds simple, right?   Here’s the key aspect that you need to understand about how to remove false information from the DAC report.  Its’ very simple . . . you must have verifiable, tangible, physical . . . some kind of PROOF showing that your account is indeed fact.  Without proof, without evidence, chances of having the false info removed is very slim.

    They have specific procedures for drivers to follow to begin the dispute process and having false info removed from the report. The main reason drivers have trouble having false info removed, is because the driver has no physical or verifiable proof.

    This was further ruled on from the ruling of the April, 2009 court case:

    Eaton vs. Raven Transport

    “The above case teaches that to hold the trucking company liable, the allegation MUST not only allege that the trucking company made a false report to DAC;  but that there MUST be sufficient evidence showing that the trucking company knew their report to DAC was false when it was made to DAC.”

    Based on this case, it was determined by the courts that:

    “The transport company cannot hide behind a “qualified privilege” when it makes intentional false statements on the DAC report.  The transport company will be held legally liable for such intentional and malicious conduct. Not only will the company be liable for compensatory damages resulting from the truckers’ inability to obtain work;  but its malicious conduct warrants punitive damages.”

    Here is the actual quote determining the win for the driver:

    “Plaintiff is a pro se litigant pursuing a claim related to losing his job as a truck driver. …Plaintiff has accused Raven of making defamatory statements about him to the EEOC and the DOL as well as to a potential employer, D. Krutiak Trucking (“Krutiak”). Raven has also been accused of releasing defamatory statements in a DAC Report, an employment-history database for motor carriers. Raven has moved to dismiss on the grounds that the statements that they made were privileged and not subject to liability.

    Plaintiff claims that these statements were knowingly false and have made it difficult for him to secure other employment….. (a) An employer or any person employed by the employer who discloses information about a current or former employee’s job performance to a prospective employer is presumed to be acting in good faith; and unless lack of good faith is shown, is immune from civil liability for such disclosure or its consequences. For purposes of this section, the presumption of good faith may be rebutted upon a showing that the information disclosed by such employer was knowingly false, was deliberately misleading or was rendered with malicious purpose; or that the information was disclosed in violation of a nondisclosure agreement, or was otherwise confidential according to applicable federal, State or local statute, rule or regulation.

    This privilege carries a rebuttable presumption of good faith. Qualified privilege will not attach to the DAC Report or Raven’s communications with Krutiak if they were knowingly false, deliberately, misleading, or rendered with malicious purpose……..Plaintiff has alleged that Raven’s statements were knowingly false and rendered with malice. Since this Court must assume that these allegations are true for the purposes of this motion…Plaintiff’s defamation claim for the DAC Report and for communications with Krutiak cannot be dismissed now…

    Considering the foregoing, Raven’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED”

    Eaton v. Raven Transport.

    Not Reported in A.2d, 2009 WL 1277991

    Del. Super., April 2009.

    First, follow the procedures that DAC wants you to take.  If that fails and you consider a lawsuit, remember the understanding that came from the ruling of April, 2009: 

    “That there MUST be sufficient evidence showing that the trucking company knew their report to DAC was false when it was made to DAC.”

    To request a copy of your DAC Report . . .

    To File a dispute . . .

    For more information on the DAC services . . .

    I’ll keep you informed on the DAC petition and how it’s looking, and will never just throw out “numbers from the air.” I wish I could give you a powerful and impressive “handle” . . . but my handle is just Allen Smith.

    Thanks for all your support.


    © 2010, AskTheTrucker. All rights reserved.


    Add to Technorati Favorites: , , , , , ,

    Related posts

    Thousands of truckers in the United States lost their jobs in 2009.   With the economy not getting any better and nothing on the horizon to suggest that it will, are American truckers being set up for employment termination for 2010?   Is the proposed program, CSA2010 and the truck driver’s DAC Report combining forces to weed out thousands of experienced, higher paid drivers to bring in new drivers at a much lower pay scale?  Are we preparing for an influx of new foreign drivers into the United States market by opening the Mexican border which would allow the trucking companies to move our freight at a much lower pay rate for drivers?   Is this an economic attack against American drivers?   Many believe that it is.   One trucking company has stated that FMCSA expects 175,000 driver jobs will be lost when CSA2010 is implemented.

    Working very quietly in the background, it has been reported that several trucking companies are having safety meetings telling some drivers that the FMCSA is planning to do a three year background check on all truck drivers DAC Report, state and company records.   Based on the information found, the driver will be given a point rating.   Drivers found to have three or more violations of any kind will be given an unfair rating and the trucking company will be forced to terminate the driver from their employment.   A point can be assessed against the driver in relation to the proposed BMI (body mass index) of the driver and the other related point scale within the new CSA2010 regulations.  It is our understanding that this data collection against American truckers will be complete by July, 2010.   Furthermore, the large majority of this data will be provided by DAC Services, the corrupt agency which allows false information to remain on drivers reports.

    Several months ago I mentioned this scenario to Donna, but never publicly announced it.  Now, I am hearing the same concerns from others within the industry: “Is DAC Services and CSA2010 working together to force experienced, hire paid drivers out . . . to bring in drivers that can be paid at a lower rate?”

    Will the Government now hold drivers responsible for operating poorly maintained company equipment?   Will drivers be assessed violation points if their body weight is more than what the Government says it should be?   Is the FMCSA going to take the word of HireRight DAC Trucking Services?

    Is this a Governmental attack against American truck drivers to make room for lower paid, foreign drivers?

    What do you believe is going on with CSA2010 and the DAC services?

    Be sure to tune in to Truth About Trucking “LIVE” talk radio, Thursday, January 21st, 2010 at 7 PM EST for our Trucking Topics Open Discussion.

    With the near destruction of the U. S. manufacturing industry and auto dealers going out of business on a near daily basis, the trucking industry is one of the largest sector of industry on the planet.  Is this a way to ensure its survival?

    Would the U. S. Government really do such a thing, or is this another “conspiracy theory?”

    Open lines on Blog Talk Radio’s premier trucking talk show . . . Post your comments here . . .

    Read our updated post at:   CSA2010 Severity and Point System Safety Rating for Truck Drivers


    © 2010, AskTheTrucker. All rights reserved.


    Add to Technorati Favorites: , , , , , ,

    Related posts

    Will more professional truck drivers continue to come together and work to end the false reporting by trucking companies against drivers DAC reports?  Our Stop False DAC Reporting petition is nearing 1,000 signatures, but many more are needed in order to show a strong and viable case against this segment of corruption in the trucking industry.  This petition is one reason, I believe, that USIS removed itself from DAC Services, and was taken up by HireRight DAC Trucking Solutions.

    Previous false information placed on a driver’s DAC report by the former USIS/DAC Services, could even be more difficult to have removed because now, HireRight can simply say that they are not the company who placed such information on the report . . . that it was done by USIS/DAC, which is no longer associated with the services.   An interesting move as the DAC Petition grows in support?   Furthermore, the complaints by drivers continue:

    • DAC has completely ruined my Driving career. My DOT/MVR/DMV record mean nothing! to anyone in Trucking. Compared to the lying slander of this reporting agency! My understanding is of the companies that use this agency (of which is 90% of them) when checking a Drivers back ground Dac is the first check. They look” No further…if there is something Negative there, that’s it! No one compares it to local/state/federal records. Or even ask or listen to the Driver who’s career/livelihood is on the line! Nowhere” in America, is this allowed! Slander/defamation/predigest should never” be tolerated! however; this Dac agency seems to be a exception to the rule! They destroy lives, and could care less! Trucking companies use this agency to pay back Drivers that won’t put up with theie abuse! when you quit” a company…they pay you back” through this Dac reporting agency.
    • I’m a victim of this, after almost 11 yrs of driving got blacked balled by 2 companies and now with disconnection notices and an eviction notice I’m unable to get a driving job, a father of 2 young kids my life is ruined, now at 45yrs of aged I’m suppose to start over again, thanks U S Government, thanks for the American dream.
    • I agree.   I am a victim of dac reports.  I’ve been a driver for 10 years nowand it’s impossible to get dac to do anything for the drivers.  They gave me a real hard time getting copies, they also had a false report from a company that I had left years ago. The only thing I was allowed to do is write a statement, but most companies are going to believe the company over a driver.  I want to end Dac.
    • I hope something can be done.  I’ve been out work for two years now,because no trucking company would hire me. I have some false report on my DAC, and trying get information on how can I get this fixed.  It is a shame how companies  don’t care.  I  am a good driver,  never had a accident, and pretty sure there are drivers out there like me that are having the same frustration not able to get a decent job as a professional driver.  I just hope something can be done soon.  I would give all my support and help to fight this abuse against my fellow drivers.  I am here to sign this petition and take action to try to help fix this problem we are having.  You have all my support, and God bless you.

    Help to spread the word about the DAC petition.   We will be posting a PDF file soon that you can print and fill out and submit to your area U.S. State Attorney’s office in order to move forward with this issue.   I will also be updating our YouTube DAC video ASAP . . .

    Appreciate everyone’s help . . .

    Allen Smith

    Sign the STOP False DAC Reporting Petition . . .

    © 2010, AskTheTrucker. All rights reserved.


    Add to Technorati Favorites: , , , , , , , , ,

    Related posts

    File Dispute with DAC Report Online

    The DAC Report Services, now known as HireRight, now allows truck drivers to file a dispute online, concerning the placement of false information on their DAC.   Drivers can also request a copy of their DAC Report online.   HireRight DAC Trucking Solutions still operates in the same manner as the former DAC Reporting Services . . . different headquarters . . . same people . . . different name.    Here’s the update information you need:

    • Corporate Headquarters
      5151 California Avenue
      Irvine, CA 92617
      1-800-400-2761
      1-949-428-5800
    • Customer Service
      1-866-521-6995
      1-949-428-5804
    • HireRight Tulsa
      4500 S. 129th East Avenue
      Suite 200
      Tulsa, OK 74134-5885
      1-800-331-9175
    1. To request a copy of your DAC Report online:    Online DAC Report Request
    2. To File a dispute online: Report DAC Report Dispute

    According to their website:

    HireRight will conduct an investigation, free of charge, if you believe information in your report is incomplete or inaccurate.  Before filing a dispute, you need to possess a copy of your report that is no older than 60 days (in order to help ensure that you are disputing information currently maintained by HireRight).  The dispute reinvestigation process can take up to 30 days.

    Information can also be found from our web page:   Everything you need to know about the truck driver dac report

    Stop false DAC Reporting petition reaches 830 signatures . . . keep them coming!   Here are a few more DAC horror stories:

    • I too,  have been a victim of such a mess.  It was said that I abandoned a truck, but I did not.  I left the truck at the terminal that I picked up from when I first started working for them.  It is  still on my record.
    • I have fallen victim to this practice.  I have been out of work since July because of two false reports from companies I have worked for.   As to add insult to injury, one of them has gone as far as to stop my ability to draw unemployment.  Enough is enough.  This has to stop.  I have already contacted my congressman as to this travesty.  Something has to be done.
    • I worked for *******  for 10 years as a driver and a trainer. While driving through Bakersfield, CA about 10 years ago,  I was the victim of a hit-and-run accident. A pick-up truck came out of a bar parking lot and clipped my fender causing minimal damage. The driver then proceeded to leave the scene at a high rate of speed. I pulled over and immediately called 911 and a highway patrolman was dispatched to the location. He took the report and I then called my company and reported it to the safety department. A few years later I decided to sever employment with *******  and did everything that was expected…gave them 2 weeks notice, delivered my truck to their main terminal in Salt Lake City, cleaned the truck inside and out, and left on what I thought was good terms. I applied for a job with another company and they ran my D.A.C. report…it said that I was involved in a hit-and-run but neglected to mention that I was the victim.  It virtually took an act of Congress to resolve the issue to the satisfaction of the new company. As far as I know that entry is still on my DAC.
    • I have had false reports filed against me:  an in house on-yard accident which never occurred,   a truck abandonment which never occurred,   a refusal to run without hours, terminated -refusal to drive when interstate closed due to ice . . .these people must be stopped from doing this.

    Fight back against the DAC . . . sign the petition . . . write your State Attorney General . . .

    © 2009, AskTheTrucker. All rights reserved.


    Add to Technorati Favorites: , , , , , ,

    Related posts

    The Dac Report – The Horrible Stories Continue

    By Donna Smith

    So, you don’t think we have a REAL problem with the DAC Report?   If you haven’t received  a copy of yours yet,  I recommend that you do so.  People’s lives are being ruined by a system that has no check and balances.  Simply put, a company can send whatever comments they want about an employee to HireRight and that’s it!

    Unlike the personal credit reporting systems where you can dispute something and then the burden is placed on the company to prove the accusation, not so with DAC.   It is much more difficult to get wrongful information off of your DAC.   You can dispute it, but it’s a lengthy process that is extremely time consuming and frusutrating for most ( many people need help with the process.)

    Here’s an example of one of the many DAC emails we receive.  You won’t believe this one…and it goes on all the time.  The gentleman who wrote us gave us permission to place this on the blog with his full name.

    Allen & Donna,

    I pulled a DAC report on myself and noted a major flaw, as the company I haven’t even driven for yet stated that I damaged equipment that resulted in injury or death.   I have threatened to sue them.   Was I right in doing that or what should I do?  It’s not that I’m looking for a career as a driver, as I’m seeking employment as a news reporter!

    Thanks in advance!

    Pete Kleckner

    Please sign the petition.   Also, we have updated our web page to reflect the changes in the DAC Services information:  Everything you need to know about the DAC Report.

    Also, we received an email from Wayne Weisser of Life on the Road News Blog a couple of days ago.  He said that if you are an owner operator with 2+ years experience and are  having problems because of a bad DAC,  contact him at:

    wayne@bohemian.net

    He runs all 48,  no Canada and no Hazmat.   He has a small dry van company.

    © 2009, AskTheTrucker. All rights reserved.


    Add to Technorati Favorites: , , , , ,

    Related posts